Saturday, May 4, 2024

A Recovery Plan That is There to Protect the State, Not Economy

Duarte Marques, PSD Member of Parliament

The fight against the pandemic caused by Covid19 forced the adoption of a set of measures that destroyed many European economies. At the request of governments, companies were forced to suspend their activity and States were forced to help people and companies in a scenario of less revenue (less tax) and more expenditure. All of this has led Europe to take action and to approve an unprecedented aid package – European bazooka – adding up to the European Budget.

The Portuguese Plan should respond to three assumptions that I consider fundamental for the use of European funds: not to finance current expenditure; not to substitute funds that are part of the State Budget; make reproductive investment that removes barriers and increases the competitiveness of our economy.

The option already announced by the Government, however, gives the State a clear priority. On the one hand, it bets on long-needed infrastructures, such as the reform of the railway that takes advantage of decarbonisation, and on the other, given the failure of public policies on housing in the last 5 years, the bazooka will also be there to recover and build social housing at controlled costs in the municipalities of the metropolitan area of Lisbon, reinforce the weak network of continuous care and re-equip the schools’ obsolete technological equipment. The Public Administration will receive € 3 billion out of a total of € 12 billion. As for the corporate sector, the Government Plan submitted to Brussels only allocates directly one billion euros to companies.

Now, it was expected that the Government would take advantage of the plan to finance part of the increase in expenditure as a result of the need to respond to COVID19, but António Costa took the opportunity to make the investments he promised in 2015 and which, despite the continued growth of the economy soon after 2014, he preferred to freeze. This means that the bazooka will not be used for Portugal to recover from the COVID effects, but rather to recover from the divestment in key sectors that António Costa, Centeno, Jerónimo and Catarina imposed on us since 2015.

If it is true that many of the announced investments make sense and match the proposals the PSD presented as an alternative on October 5, the main difference lies in the priority given to the economy and the business sector. While the proposal submitted by the Government allocated only one billion euros (less than 10%) to companies, the PSD advocated that of the € 12.5 billion available, at least € 4 billion should be intended for companies and the economy. It’s not a small difference, it’s four times more.

These are crucial differences and which in the future may well imply a country more dependent on the State and its social income, or Portugal with a more vigorous economy, with more wealth and where people depend less on State support because they simply don’t need it, as they have jobs, the average salary has gone up and the economy is recovering smoothly from lockdown.

This plan seems to be yet another missed opportunity because it requires more permanent spending, does not solve structural delays and gives in again to electoral temptations. With this plan, neither the country grows stronger nor the State becomes more capable: it remains a heavier state, with more potential white elephants and more expenditure to pay wages.

This aid from Brussels will be our last opportunity to implement the structural reforms the country has postponed. It is also up to us, therefore, to ensure the proper use of these funds and the Parliament should play a central role here, forcing the Government to be constantly accountable.

Partilhe este artigo:

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Artigos recentes | Recent articles

AMO and H/Advisors – A short history

It all started 22 years ago on Madison Avenue. Three of the world’s most senior financial PR professionals met to discuss a ground-breaking alliance, that would change the shape of the communications industry.

A conversation with Henry Kissinger

Over two days in late April 2023, The Economist spent over eight hours in conversation with Dr Kissinger. Just weeks before his 100th birthday, the former secretary of state and national security adviser laid out his concerns about the risks of great power conflict and offered solutions for how to avoid it. This is a transcript of the conversation, lightly edited for clarity.

The world on the wrong path

A new geopolitical and economic order is being written through the emergence of China as an economic, military and diplomatic superpower and threatening the status of the United States. We are heading towards a multipolar world in which the search for strategic autonomy is changing the dynamics of international trade for the worse. Nothing will be more determinant to the world’s destiny over forthcoming years than the relationship between Beijing and Washington. Europe risks being a mere bystander.

Mais na Prémio

More at Prémio

- Advertisement -